Find the most up-to-date version of SAE AS at Engineering STANDARD: FITTING END, FLARED TUBE CONNECTION, PRECISION TYPE , STANDARD DIMENSIONS (03 JUN ) [SUPERSEDED BY SAE-AS]. 29 Sep Any design of adapter component to the left of plane A-A is acceptable provided that dimension A, the requirements and notes of this.
|Published (Last):||25 May 2016|
|PDF File Size:||19.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
1/2″ Check Valve
Download Now The Architecture, Engineering and Construction AEC industry is constantly looking for process improvements to better manage potential project delays and costs. Such issues are the result of project complexity, size, uniqueness and regulation, as well as the need for virtual team collaboration.
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
In the past, when MS was more popular, Parker fittings were made with this chamfer. Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. Aerospace fluid fittings and ax4395 fluid fittings are way-different beasts and should never be mixed. The two fittings are not manufactured to the same standards.
Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. This also applies to: However, this port has been superseded by SAE J in industrial applications for over 50 years.
Quality and process control are paramount in the aerospace industry. I’m designing equipment for ground testing and it will never fly.
Close this window and log in.
Register now while it’s still free! Resources Few production environments have the luxury a4s395 ordering new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor.
Best regards, Terry http: The company I work for builds airborne equipment and our development machine shop has the tools for boring and threading the AS ports but not the J commercial ports.
Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community. Students Click Here Join Us! And one thing that you should not do is allow a situation in your manufacturing facility where tools or hardware that are non-conforming might be used for production hardware.
37 degree fitting compatability – aircraft vs. commercial – Aircraft engineering – Eng-Tips
Unfortunately, test technicians can often be lazy, and if they need to replace a fitting that interfaces with the test article on an acceptance test fixture, they might grab whatever is handy. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework. I know that the threads are class 3 on the AS fittings and class 2 on the J fittings. This would imply that the catalog is pre But as wktaylor noted, even if it fits, you should never substitute a commercial grade fluid fitting in place of an aircraft spec fluid fitting that is specified by the equipment manufacturer.
1/2″ Check Valve
By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. The Architecture, Engineering and Construction AEC industry is constantly looking for process improvements to better manage potential project delays and costs. All ws4395 the other equipment in the system uses the J ports and I would like to keep the fittings, nuts and sleeves the same. Even if you are constructing a test rig that will be used for qualification or acceptance testing of flight hardware, you need to be careful about the components you use.
VC100-6T vent valve for potable water with 3/8″ AS4395-06 inlet and 1/8″ NPT outlet
Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. No, I don’t intend to install commercial tube fittings on an aircraft!
Found an old Parker catalog with the following zs4395 Can the commercial fittings be used in an AS port? Few production environments have the luxury of as495 new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. If this happens to be a commercial fitting rather than the required aircraft spec fitting and a source inspector happens to catch it, even something this silly can create a huge QA non-conformance problem for your company. The added cost of using aircraft spec fittings and cutting tools even for your test fixtures is well worth it.